The Police的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列評價、門市、特惠價和推薦等優惠

Serpico

為了解決The Police的問題，作者Maas, Peter/ Serpico, Frank 這樣論述：

The 1960s was a time of social and generational upheaval felt with particular intensity in the melting pot of New York City. A culture of corruption pervaded the New York Police Department, where payoffs, protection, and shakedowns of gambling rackets and drug dealers were common practice. The so

-called blue code of silence protected the minority of crooked cops from the sanction of the majority.Into this maelstrom came a working class, Brooklyn-born, Italian cop with long hair, a beard, and a taste for opera and ballet. Frank Serpico was a man who couldn't be silenced -- or bought -- and h

e refused to go along with the system. He had sworn an oath to uphold the law, even if the perpetrators happened to be other cops. For this unwavering commitment to justice, Serpico nearly paid with his life.

The Police進入發燒排行的影片

羅蘭·巴特符號思維啟示下仿古街區的路徑發展研究—以鹽鎮水街為例

為了解決The Police的問題，作者周穎 這樣論述：

隨著全球化進程與全面實行現代意義的城市建設，中國各城市文化面臨著嚴峻的發展壓力。仿古街區是眾多城市文化建設中的一個分支，是體現城市文脈延續的良好方式。但當文化依循著市場需求、經濟的調整而失去它自身本位時，文化便落入了一種形式符號，成為資本增值的生產象徵。本作為改善城市的均質現象、增加地方活力的積極途徑，變成了被操控、且被批判的消極對象。因此，面對各城市現存的邊緣化仿古街區，亟待被認知其自身的處境與價值，並為其找到可以指導良序發展的理論依據。在本研究中，首先，通過文獻的對比轉變了傳統看待仿古街區的視角，確認了仿古街區應該具備群體性、流動性、公共性內涵，突出了地方文化與場域發展應基於地方居民的特

徵。其次，基於仿古街區作為符號運作的載體之一，本研究借助了符號學理論對其場域文化符碼被神話化的背後邏輯進行了探索，並主要以對羅蘭巴特言語觀與整體觀的分析，延伸了得以服務於地方話語得以融入原權利話語團體的轉換層級，並將其轉化成模型。接著，選取了一個個案場域，通過定性與定量的工具使得基於地方的話語與場域關係的連結圖得以建立，最終確認了四條主要關係的關係連結圖，並供研究進一步對比、評估並調整場域神話文本的重視項，進而提出各路徑發展策略。結果表明，一方面，地方人所關注的點的優先性與神話文本確實存在差異性；另一方面，仿古街區的場域職能不僅僅只是旅遊經濟的一種形式，更是一個結合、調動地方居民、地方知識、地

方文化資源的網絡資訊中心，確認了屬於仿古街區價值的落腳點。本研究不僅提供了針對仿古街區的新的思考範式，也期為日後如何實踐仿古街區的獨立性、多樣性以及整體性發展提供了參考依據。

Police Misconduct, Complaints, and Public Regulation

為了解決The Police的問題，作者Beggs Qc, John,Davies Obe Qc, Hugh 這樣論述：

Police Misconduct, Complaints, and Public Regulation covers the highly sensitive topic of who polices the police. The book provides comprehensive coverage of the law and procedure relating to the regulation of the police, offering practical guidance on complaint and misconduct hearings, as well as d

etailed analysis of the powers of the IPCC and of its statutory guidance. It includes dedicated chapters on related sets of proceedings, notably the complaints and discipline process (from recording the complaint through to the Police Appeals Tribunal), specific criminal offences (such as misconduct

in public office and manslaughter), inquest proceedings, public inquiries, and judicial review. The new edition has been rigorously updated to reflect the substantial developments in the law since the introduction of the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2012 and the Police Reform and Social Responsibil

ity Act 2011, including the powers and duties of the new Police and Crime Commissioners. The authors bring together, in a detailed and practical narrative, the relevant statutory powers, secondary legislation, statutory guidance, and increasing body of High Court jurisprudence. Appendices include al

l the key rules and regulations and associated Home Office Guidance under the 2012 performance and misconduct regimes, as well as the 2012 Police Appeals Tribunal Rules. Written by expert barristers with unrivalled experience representing and advising police forces and officers, this highly-regarded

book is an invaluable resource for all practitioners involved in police misconduct. John Beggs QC, Barrister, Serjeants’ Inn Chambers, Hugh Davies OBE QC, Barrister, Three Raymond BuilidingsJohn Beggs QC is a barrister at Serjeants’ Inn Chambers, called in 1989. His practice is mainly related to

the police service: he has represented most police forces in the UK and has appeared in many of the high profile trials, discipline hearings, inquests, inquiries, and judicial reviews involving the police over the last decade, prosecuting and defending in the major police misconduct cases. He has le

ctured widely to police forces. Hugh Davies OBE QC is a barrister at Three Raymond Buildings, called in 1990. His practice spans criminal and police law including proceedings relating to the actions and accountability of police forces and police officers and advising and representing police officers

at public inquiries, inquests, IPCC supervised investigations, and internal disciplinary proceedings. He has lectured widely to police forces.

開放民眾檢舉交通違規政策設計與執行爭議之研究

為了解決The Police的問題，作者李瑞泰 這樣論述：

政府開放民眾檢舉交通違規政策，期待以「警民協力」的方式遏阻警察不在場僥倖違規的行為，以達成民眾能遵守交通法規、減少交通事故發生之目的。自從開放民眾檢舉交通違規，檢舉案件從 2013年起逐年暴增，一直到 2020年已增加成長超過 30倍；然而，高舉發量並無降低交通事故傷亡人數，造成｢警疲民怨」，屢有提案廢除本項檢舉政策聲浪不斷增加。透過Schneider 與 Ingram 1990）政策設計的結構邏輯觀點，本研究主要探 討政府開放民眾檢舉交通違規政策設計的適當性，並透過焦點座談會及深入訪談等質性研究方法，檢視現行交通違規檢舉政策是否在存過度授權的問題？未來如何修正開放民眾檢舉交通違規的政策設計

，以發揮輔助警察執法及達成改善交通秩序的目標。本研究主要發現包括：(1)現行開放民眾檢舉交通違規的政策設計，存在過度授權的問題； ；(2)開放民眾檢舉交通違規的政策，如每年產出檢舉超過 60％違規停車案但多數缺乏公益性和必要性，同時造成｢警疲民怨」的副作用；以及 (3)未來應限縮開放民眾檢舉交通違規的項目，特別是著重於危害交通安全情節重大 之違規行為檢舉。